OBAMA CAMPAIGN MEMO - WELCOME TO OHIO


Delightful, Friendship, Purity, Honesty and Paradise, Greasy Ridge, Hardscrabble, Worstville, Tick Ridge, Fleatown, Hell's Corners, Devil Town, Assumption, Knockemstiff, Lickskillet, Mudsock and Round Bottom: 

What do all these towns have in common? 
10/21/2012



The heart of it all, in the 2012 presidential election
Greetings Ohio citizen. You are a very special person. Can't you tell? If you're not in Ohio, you may not be as special, but you're tolerable. 

16 days before the 2012 presidential voting day and it's a great time to be from the Buckeye State, is it not? 


The Obama campaign sure thinks so. And why not? It's very likely that Ohio will decide the next four years in terms of who will be President of these United States.  It will be the "Florida" of 2012.


As such, the polls in this state have been front and center for a couple of months. President Obama has always been in the lead  with his lead contracting from a margin of about 9 points in March 2012, about 3 points, now, in mid-October 2012 .

Ohio is normally seen as fertile ground for republicans. After all, its republican Governor, John Kasich is an old Fox News employee. Regardless, many have attributed the state being in President Obama's  corner as due to a few factors including, the effect of the  Auto Bailout (auto-making affects 1 of 8 jobs in the state) and the fact that jobs numbers are much better in Ohio in than they are nationwide. This is a fact that even Governor Kasich is touting. Governor Romney must love that.


But the race has apparently been tightening in Governor Romney's favor. All polls show that.


Some people, a group that includes me, feel that 2 things should be remembered when looking at these tightening polls. 1. These polls DO NOT include early and absentee voters. Early and absentee voting in many battleground states like Ohio and Iowa, is booming. and the estimates say it could be as high as 35-40%; 5-10% higher than in 2008.  But early voters are NOT polled. That's an antiquated part of the polling system that should be updated. 2. Obama  is leading with early voters. A fact the campaign has laid out below. Since early voting started in Ohio on October 4, 2012, every day that Obama is in the lead, he is actually winning.

My personal theory is that Governor Romney has hit his ceiling in Ohio, regarding the polls. Not every statistical tie, is created equal. And there is certainly a difference between a 3 point lead that can be recovered and one that cannot be. I think that the fact that Governor Romney has never lead in Ohio, shows Obama's lead there to be of the latter persuasion. I'm certain people will remind me of this on November 6th, 2012, if I'm wrong.

Regardless of my own sloppy electoral predictions, the Obama campaign has always maintained, from the beginning that this will be a close race. Nonetheless, the campaign has released the following document regarding Ohio, which I received this morning. Four more years: 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Memo from Jeremy Bird, National Field Director re: Early Voting in Ohio
Democrats are building upon the historic grassroots organization we built in Ohio in 2008, including our 125 Obama for America offices in every corner of the state. As a result of that strong foundation and enthusiasm for President Obama, today we are ahead of where we were at this time against John McCain - and ahead of Mitt Romney. Republicans are similarly talking up their ground game and early vote numbers, but their assertions rest on much shakier ground.
Before we address Republicans' claims, here are some numbers reflecting Democrats' strong position in the critical state of Ohio:
1.    All public polling shows that the President has a double-digit lead among those who have voted:
·     Survey USA found that Obama leads by 19 points (57/38) among those who have voted already.

·      Rasmussen, a Republican pollster, found that Obama leads by 29 points (63/34) among those who have voted already.

·      The Wall Street Journal/NBC poll found that Obama leads by 26 points (63/37) among   those who have voted already.

·      PPP found that Obama leads by 52 points (76/24) among those who have voted already.
2. Registration numbers strongly favor President Obama:
·      Four in five Ohioans (81 percent) who have registered to vote in 2012 are either female, younger than 30, or African-American or Latino - all demographics that strongly favor President Obama.

·      Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of Ohioans who have registered to vote in 2012 - and the same percentage among those who have already voted -live in counties that President Obama won in 2008.
3. Early vote numbers strongly favor President Obama:
·      More than half (55 percent) of the early-vote ballots requested so far this year have been requested by women, 3 percentage points greater than 2008 early voters.
·      582,402 ballots have been requested this year from precincts that Obama won in 2008, 33,414 more than in from precincts that McCain won.

·      The total number of votes already cast this year (both by mail and in-person) from precincts Obama won in 2008 is 261,304 - 55,636 more than from precincts McCain won.

·      Democrats' margin over Republicans in votes cast has increased by 21,792 compared with this point four years ago.
Mitt Romney's campaign is touting "the gains Republicans are making across Ohio since early voting began," saying that they are "out-performing voter registration in Ohio's largest counties." But there is a major flaw in this claim, as Professor Michael P. McDonald explained:
The problem with this assertion is that Ohio does not have party registration. "Party" in Ohio is a record of the last party primary a voter participated in. Naturally, with only a contested 2012 Republican presidential primary, the number of "registered Republicans" in the state increased.
It turns out Republicans' mangled math isn't limited to a mystery tax cut plan that doesn't add up.
Because Republicans had a competitive primary this year and Democrats did not, as Professor McDonald points out, Republicans have a 460,000-person edge this year in past primary voters­, or what Romney's campaign is disingenuously referring to as "voters registered as Republicans."
Despite our smaller numbers, however, Democratic primary voters are outvoting Republican primary voters by a wide margin across the state. A greater percentage of Democratic primary voters than Republican primary voters have requested a ballot, have returned a mail ballot and have voted in person. Altogether, 145,880 Democratic primary voters have cast ballots, 28,013 more than Republican primary voters.
President Obama is winning early vote among primary election voters in the key battleground of Ohio. 

OBAMA CAMPAIGN MESSAGE AND STRATEGY BRIEFING

It's like the bat signal
For all my Obama Supporters. A Message from OFA...
10/12/2012

Below, is a campaign briefing I received this morning from an unlisted YOUTUBE link put up by OFA headquarters in Chi-town. I can only assume that I received this due to my past volunteer work on the Obama campaign, as well as my small monetary contributions.

I better get a victory party invite, too.

While this link MUST be sent to you for you to see it (A GBJ EXCLUSIVE!). I believe that it is OK to share, particularly cause it says "share it with your friends," underneath the clip.

I like the video, but I'm a partisan wonk. This is gonna be boring as hell to most normal humans. To me, it makes some of the best cases, unemotionally, for President Obama. In fact, while watching it, a right-wing house guest of mine was listening in the other room and was impressed with the clarity of the message in comparison to "most of the propaganda" I listen to (his words). He had no idea what I was watching, or where it was from.

I realize that there are opponents of the President who will see this video and mock it but I'm hoping that they would not want to sit through 20 minutes of this "Kool-Aid" stuff. So this isn't directed at them.

This, is about winning an election. Period.

For the Detractors, allow me to address you now...

Ahem.

FOUR MORE YEARS!

THE BEST REACTIONS TO THE FIRST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE


THURSDAY MORNING QUARTERBACKING...
October 5, 2012

Okay. So the general consensus is that Mitt Romney beat the President in the first presidential debate of  2012. Somewhat like a drum.

Mitt's not my guy. I think he's a liar. Not in the same way that everybody's liar, either. But I don't disagree with the general consensus. Mr. Romney beat Mr Obama. And a beating in front of 67 million people, is a helluva beating.

Nonetheless, I support the President in his reelection bid and I still think he will win the election, quite handily. I could be wrong. But either way, I'm enjoying the show. This debate last night was, by far, the best show on television and the campaigns will continue to play dates until election day.

Sometimes the most enjoyable aspect of a debate like this, when you love politics like I do, is the aftermath. And so, rather than bore you with my own critiques of the two performances, I'll bore you with the opinions of people from a higher tax bracket. Below, I've compiled some of my favorite reactions to the debate.

------------------------------------------------------------
Progressive Chris Matthews almost lost his wig on MSNBC late Wednesday night while covering the debate (clarification: I do not know if Matthews wears a wig).

I started with his rant, cause it most mirrors my own feelings on the President's performance. Wanna know how I feel? Click "play." I'm a huge fan of Chris. I know he considered running for office a couple of years ago and I hope he does it.



Former New Hampshire Governor John H. Sununu, a Romney campaign worker, had what I call "strong opinions" on the debate. According to Mr. Sununu, "we have a bumbler in the White House."

While I find it ironic that anyone in the Romney campaign would have the nerve to call anyone a "bumbler," Mr. Sununu went on to call the President "lazy," and "not bright" on Fox News Thursday Oct. 4th.

I think it's pretty clear that Mr. Sununu will say just about anything.



Of course, that cigar-smoking, educated gentleman of the highest order, Rush Limbaugh, had something to say about the debate as well. His enlightening explanation of Mr. Obama's lackluster performance included a suggestion that the President of the United States was high on Xanax. He may have been referring to this article, in the NY Times. But the author wasn't as "suggestive" as Rush was. Not everybody can be a gentleman of the highest order, I guess.

Anybody that knows of Rush's seedy past with prescription drugs would consider his rhetoric to be ironic, to say the least.



President Obama, himself, had some remarks regarding the debate. He made his remarks forcefully, while staring Mitt Romney into the ground with intimidation while on the debate stage in Denver.

No, I'm just kidding that's not what happened. That's what I wish had happened. I'll start over.

President Obama reacted to Mitt Romney's debate inconsistencies bravely, in front of a crowd of people like me, who donated money to his campaign, in Denver after the actual debate where it really mattered.

That's all I have to say, about that.



For now at least...

***UPDATE:

I just discovered the best reaction to the debate. The best of the best, that is. MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell on his show, The Last Word. I do believe he gives the best advice on how to regard those who tell you who "won" the debate. His advice? Wait and see.


Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

WHERE TO WATCH THE FIRST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES


Showdown. No Cable? Watch it on Live Stream!!!

October 3, 2012

Tonight.

Tonight, President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney are going to face off in the first of three televised presidential debates. The two candidates will meet at the University of Denver to answer questions around domestic policy, and the whole spectacle will be moderated by Jim Lehrer.

The debate will be aired by a multitude of TV channels, including ABC, CNN and PBS, starting at 6 p.m. PT (9p.m. ET). Of course, there are also going to be a number of live streams as well as second-screen experiences. Check out our definitive guide to watching the debate online below:
  • ABC News will be streaming the debate live on its YouTube channel as well as its iPad app.
  • CBS News will stream the debate live on Ustream.
  • Fox News will be streaming the debate on its site starting at 4:45pm PT, and also feature some insights into the most popular topics of the evening through an exclusive collaboration with Twitter.
  • Hulu will feature live feeds from ABC, Fox and The Wall Street Journal, including pre- and post-debate content. The site will also have an archived version of the entire debate available soon after.
  • The Wall Street Journal is providing a live feed of the debate on it site as well as through its WSJ Live apps on the iPad, on Android devices and various Smart TV platforms.
  • Politico’s website streams the debate as well as some pre- and post-debate coverage, starting at 5pm PT.
  • Univision’s live stream of the presidential debate will be translated into Spanish in real-time.
  • C-SPAN is going to stream the debate on it site as part of its debates hub. C-SPAN’s live feed comes with closed captions, which can be turned on here.
  • The Sunlight Foundation will provide a fact-checked live stream with contextual data as part of its Sunlight Live project.
  • Aereo will give New York-based viewers two hours of free access to its TV streaming service to watch live streams of major broadcasters’ debate coverage on their laptops or mobile devices.

  • Android users can cheer and boo with their mobile device.
    The Peel companion app will allow Android users to digitally cheer and boo during the debate, and see how others like the performance of both candidates. The app will also reveal who won the debate amongst Peel’s base of users.
  • Ponderoo gives iOS users a chance to provide feedback on the debate with a somewhat experimental, but intriguingly simple interface.
  • Al Jazeera English teamed up with Reddit for context and commentary during the debate.
SOURCE: GIGAOM.COM